I did let moma know that there is two teams with 2 players on from higher division. They said they didnt think they were that strong of a team. They admited they both were not supose to be on same team but is letting it go. So is that fair? Rules say one player from the class above. Or am i wrong?

I talked to Wayne about this. The two teams in question are as follows:
Richie Cunningham, Jeff VanSickle, and three others. I don't care who the three others are, those two players are masters, so they belong in masters.
Brian Sigel's team - if there are two masters on their team, they belong in the masters.
These two teams might be "borderline" teams, but if their criteria meets AA, they should be AA. If they have two masters on their team, I don't care if the other three players are B players - they belong in Masters. It's that simple - follow the same rules as everyone else!
I can understand the amount of work it takes Wayne and his staff to get everyone placed in the proper division, but when these issues come up, just follow the rules that regulate the criteria for placement and your butt is covered. If two players are masters, then they play masters. It's not anyone's fault they maybe put together a bad combination of players for that division.... I wish you all luck next week at MOMA. Take care.
John Stich

Thank You for letting us all know that you informed Wayne about the situation but like you said it takes alot of work to get everyone placed in the right division. You are the tournament director for ACS which brings a question for you. Mark Kuklok took 3RD in the AA a couple 3 yrs ago or so and he is playing in the AA at MOMA is that right or wrong?

Again here we go with the who's who and where they should be. Jeff plays very well, not going to deny that. He also plays open division at the casino events and if he did play in them what has he won? He is not on any masters list that I have seen or heard of! We fit the criteria....TYVM